Search results

I'd say the same thing I've said on repeat now—that's not what the line means or indicates. lol I've explained this from every angle I can. I will confidently say that this is NOT the normal conclusion to draw from that scene, and is hardly representative of the average fan's comprehension of...

Exactly, this something that they do. Hence what I've been saying, over and over, which is that then logically, that line has nothing to do with Cloud's Identity and the Lifestream sequence. The only fans who are taking it that way are extreme CAs and possibly you, though you have every...

Love a good Lunar post. lol Makes me get my coffee, glasses, and sit down a bit. But yeah, all of that. The information and the lines of logic are there to understand it, you just have to be able to recognize it. But it feels like that's hard because of the "war", I understand. Which I don't...

I did make my point above, so see that!^ But one separate thing to address—what exactly are you talking about? Because, and I mean correct me, with what I hope is more than an extended interpretative point on Aerith's actions—when was this the actual point of Aerith giving away the White...

Haha So I think I get it—to be clear, this is two different "saves". What I'm saying is that "saving the world = saving Cloud" is a literal thing, because it's one in the same. If the world is gone, so is Cloud and everyone else—we're talking about life and death here, not Cloud's inner-self. It...

Lol So I do assume that this is more about what certain illogical CAs have taken from it? That this is Aerith's way of saying that she's gonna push Tifa out and do the lifestream sequence herself? Cause I mean otherwise, the line is fine? Aerith including the sentiment of Cloud makes sense (in...

Its tremendously added by this fandom as well. Lol That of which is arguably an applicable addition that doesn't harm the context (and is inherently considered because of surrounding elements of the flower giving 'arc'), and still covers at least a recognizable part of intent in the line...

Well, there are other places where the meaning of the flower is mentioned, so any older fan who'd see it as a "I caught that" moment, or a new fan who is able to interpret the layered meaning (if they even know they're supposed to)—they'd still be able to piece the subtext together. Either it's...

Ultimately, feelings evoked by the loss have to change for her to move on, NOT by what was evoked from the relationship. Change of function within the loss. There are particulars to every situation, of course, but normally this is the case. Romantic feelings for Zack are that of which naturally...

Agreed, and I even mean that just for the sake of her feelings towards Zack in isolation, too. The usual "she doesn't love anymore" attempt, which is irrelevant typically with loss, or the attempts to reduce all context of the relationship down to a simple crush. And by all I mean all. It's crazy.

Which that would be it, yes. It doesn't change the feelings necessarily, but what state of being they're in or used as. Also to be specific, when I say feelings, im talking specifically of the person lost, not the expressed feelings associated with the loss. Connected they are yes, but two...

There are particulars, though. In the specific instance of dealing with loss/ambiguous loss of a loved one, this normally doesn't become a factor of intensity (i.e more or less scale) of the love. Rather, it's about it being in a state of active or passive. Even if someone fell in love with...

Now that is nice observational point too, there being a correlation between them that I like that you can draw. With what you can call the plea/request within "make me believe, don't let go of my hand"/"please, find me" and what is the hopeful result of such plea in "till we meet again"/"never...

^This is true. When some people on Twitter say the songs have "completely different meaning", ironically enough I don't think they understand what that would actually mean. There's also just, there's a lot hanging on someone's intention with how much weight they want to put on their...

Don't people, though? I'm pretty sure I've seen many of arguments in retrospect to canonicity surrounding the affinity system/Cloud's responses, not to mention the campaign of "optional = non-canonical" which went beyond the GS date alone—the two points would coexist as the latter would be used...

Somewhere within the line of "canon" and it's different applications, is where I agree that the heart of the matter is that this means something different to the creators than it does the audience. That creates a sense of different ideas of who decides what—because fandom decides for fandom, and...

Lol I actually get this, but also the other side as well, which would be surprising for most of my mutuals (@LunarTarotGirl lmao) because I'm typically such a strict person. Back in the day (2003 lol), I used to roleplay online, which was basically like DnD/Larping but for writers—I guess it's...

To me this is kind of funny. lol Because it's less about the translation and more about people's understanding of JPN and it's typical usage like for what you're talking about. The "sister" aspect comes from the JPN, in which that is what people refer to when pushing the brother-sister angle, as...

Lol Yeah that and other stuff, which I equate mostly to interpretative outcomes. That example is rough because it translates poorly grammar-wise to english, so if understanding it in japanese, I'd argue the "if you call it love" blurb is meant to have a "is this love?" feel, as opposed to, well...

Which is why it behooves me that it's somehow still being used as a dissection. Lol Not that I don't know the reason why, but I had more faith people eventually would just move on to everything else, but they don't for now 20 years. Matsuyama can't stop catching strays as a result. I get not...